<em>There are many cases which you could use for this discussion. Currently United Kingdom is leaving European Union (since 2016 the topic is on)</em>. But you can also use other examples.
*As the United Nations. Indonesia left the organization in 1965, but later re-joined the organization in 1966.
* European Union- Had few territories that left it. Greenland in 1985; Saint Barthélemey Island in 2012 and French Algeria in 1962.
* Mercosur - Venezuela was withdraw from Mercosur in 2016, not by its own will, but by the organization decisions.
You can choose one of these cases and research, what were the advantages and disadvantages, and opt accordingly with your values if is best to support or not the decision of the nation to withdraw the organization.
The reasons to withdraw is sometimes related to tax payments, desiree for political independence, being unable to comply with the organization rules or changes of interest and policies.
Using as an example for this discussion of a nation that is leaving an organization the case of United Kingdom leaving European Union you could choose to support that decision of United Kingdom to withdrawal from the European Union. The reasons for the stance on this issue is that UK already has a different currency, instead of Euro works with Libra as well. Also British pays a lot of taxes for European Union, it is the second country that contribute more for the organization and this would revert this taxes for UK. Beside these European regulations affect UK laws and power of decision in some matters related to business and immigration issues, to withdraw means more freedom to legislate. Lastly UK could give more support for local and national companies, with according with EU organization application of the funds has to pass through EU board and regulations.
Answer:
Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906
1820, Feb. Born, Adams, Mass.
1837-1838. Student, Friends seminary near Philadelphia, Pa.
1839. Teacher, Eunice Kenyon's Friends Seminary, New Rochelle, N.Y.
1846. Headmistress, Female Department, Canajoharie Academy, Rochester, N.Y.
1848. ...
1849. ...
1851. ...
1852.
Explanation:
Basic problem!
So every week he receives $7. This is then added to his total every week. So in 4 weeks, this means he has added 7+7+7+7, also known as 7x4. This results in an answer of $28 after 4 weeks!
According to most historians, <u>boosting </u><u>consumer spending</u> would have made the New Deal more effective in solving the economic crisis during the Great Depression.
<h3>What is consumer spending?</h3>
Consumer spending is the expenditure incurred by households and individuals.
Consumer spending includes expenditure on services, durable goods, and nondurable goods.
Consumer spending boosts the industrial production of goods and services by businesses. Industrial production encapsulates investments and necessary economic boosters.
Thus, most historians agreed that the New Deal (that is, the anti-depression programs of President FDR) failed to solve the economic crisis during the Great Depression because it did not boost consumer spending.
Learn more about Consumer Spending and the New Deal at brainly.com/question/1757210 and brainly.com/question/11739226
#SPJ1
