In a closed-fact problem, the main goal of tax research is to: find support for an action the taxpayer has already taken.
Explanation:
When filing a tax return, many people are medically supported. Strong tax research skills are even greater because of their complexity and application in tax law. The purpose of this chapter is to provide information and advice on tax compliance analysis as well as tax planning. In addition, the technique of tax analysis is quite similar to accounting and auditing.
The aim of tax research is to increase the profit or gains of the taxpayer. The aim is not to generate the minimum tax liability potential. Customers should determine the accuracy of tax returns or try to minimize possible IRS conflicts.
This difference of perspective — to optimize after-tax gains instead of reducing taxation — is particularly important when one considers that many tax planning techniques require such pre-tax income transfers, either in the form of additional expenditures, income avoidance or both.
Answer:
1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
1-year rate = 8%
2-year rate = 9%
3-year rate = 10%
Computation:
According to Pure Expectations Hypothesis,
(1 + 3-year rate)³ = (1 + 2-year rate)² (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
(1.10)³ = (1 + 1.09)²(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
1.331 = 1.1881 (1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now)
(1 + 1 year rate 2 year from now) = 1.12
1 year rate 2 year from now = 0.12
1 year rate 2 year from now = 12% (Approx)
Mark's action on the given scenario above is that he is showing courtesy. Courtesy is a way of showing politeness towards other people. This is shown where Mark ended the call because Kelly already arrives. He prioritizes Kelly first because he does not want to make her wait and she's already there to see him.
Answer:
the direct material quantity variance is $5,000 favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the direct material quantity variance is shown below:
Direct material quantity variance is
= (Actual quantity - standard quantity) × standard price
= (9,200 pounds - 5,100 units × 2 pounds) × $5 per pound
= (9,200 pounds - 10,200 pounds) × $5 per pound
= $5,000 favorable
hence, the direct material quantity variance is $5,000 favorable
