Answer:
1. buy more salads and fewer sandwiches.
Explanation:
As we know that
Therefore
Now the price ratio is
It is probable if you rising marginal utility numbering and reduce denominator marginal utility. If you reduce their intake, the MU of a food item will raise. Such decrease in the composition would make the quantity of the food element scarce. And its usefulness goes up. The Numerator here is sandwich MU. And to increase their marginal utility, you can reduce sandwich consumption.
Salad should need just the reverse. You raise salad intake so the MU reduces. Therefore you have to eat more salads and less chicken sandwiches to maximise the utility. So, salad is replaced by sandwiches for chicken.
Answer:
The loss of the financial institution is $413,000
Explanation:
Let's say that after 3 years the financial institution will receive:
0.5 * 10% of $10million
= 0.5 * 0.1 * 10000000
= $500,000
Then, they will pay 0.5 * 9% of $10M
= 0.5 * 0.09 * 10000000
= $450,000
Therefore, their immediate loss would be $500000 - $450000
= $50000.
Let's assume that forward rates are realized to value the rest of the swap.
The forward rates = 8% per annum.
Therefore, the remaining cash flows are assumed that floating payment is
0.5*0.08*10000000 =
$400,000
Received net payment would be:
500,000-400,000= $100,000. The total cost of default is therefore the cost of foregoing the following cash flows:
Year 3=$50,000
Year 3.5=$100,000
Year 4 = $100,000
Year 4.5= $100,000
Year 5 = $100,000
Discounting these cash flows to year 3 at 4% per six months, the cost of default would be $413,000
The best answer choice would be "B". This gives the main idea of what your debate would be about. It is also clear, and not biased or opinionated.
I hope this helps!
~cupcake
Esmeralda's promise is not enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable.
A legally enforceable contract means that you can keep the promise of the other party. If the other party fails or refuses to meet its obligations, the contract can be fulfilled in accordance with the law.
A non-enforceable contract or transaction is valid but not enforced by the court. Unenforceable is typically used in conflict with void (or void ab initio) and voidable. If the parties implement the agreement, it is valid, otherwise, the court will not enforce them.
Learn more about legally enforceable here:brainly.com/question/7306383
#SPJ1
