Answer:
cost of goods manufactured= $665,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Molina Company has a beginning and ending work in process inventories of $130,000 and $145,000 respectively. If total manufacturing costs are $680,000
We need to use the following formula:
cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP
cost of goods manufactured= 130,000 + 680,000 - 145,000
cost of goods manufactured= 665,000
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Purchasing power is related to real income and not to nominal income. Even though workers had a $10 increase in their average nominal income, due to the effects of inflation, that increase does not necessarily reflect an improve in purchasing power.
The statement is false.
Answer: Option(a) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: Primary; secondary
Primary market is a market in which new stocks and securities are issued for the first time. Firms are selling their shares and bonds for the first time to the public. For example; IPO (Initial Public Offering).
Secondary market is a market in which buying and selling of already owned securities takes place. In this type of market investors trade with each other rather than with issuing firm.
Answer: Rationalization
Explanation:
Here in this scenario, the element of fraud triangle that bis being discussed is the <em>rationalization</em>. Fraud triangle defines 3 factors which are mostly responsible and thus further tend to contribute to the increase in risk of a fraud. These are: Opportunity, Incentive, and Rationalization. Rationalization is referred to as the individual’s reason and excuse for committing a fraud.
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
