Answer:
(A) The gains of the consumers from buying imports at the low price subsidized by foreign governments would exceed the losses of domestic producers.
The Unfair-Competition Argument
(B) Companies may exaggerate the degree to which their products are essential to national defense in order to obtain protection from foreign competition at the expense of consumers.
The Protection-as-a-Bargaining-Chip Argument
(C) The country may be forced into deciding between implementing trade restrictions as threatened, which would make the society as a whole worse off, or backing down on its own threat, which would cause it to lose credibility in foreign affairs.
The Infant-Industry Argument
(D) Opening up to free trade may impose hardship on some workers in the short run, but it also creates jobs in industries in which the country has a comparative advantage and enables the country as a whole to enjoy a higher standard of living.
The Jobs Argument
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>Because firms in a perfectly competitive market does not have any price making ability or market power,they are not able to engage in any price discrimination.Hence,the correct answer is the last option or True,because perfectly competitive firms have no market power.</h2>
Explanation:
In Microeconomics,perfectly competitive markets are characterized by many buyers and sellers in which the sellers and firms usually sell homogeneous or identical products.Now,as there are many firms in the market and no barriers to entry for new firms into the market,the market competition or rivalry is high and hence,no single firm has the ability to determine and manipulate the market price according to their own economic advantage because if any firm tries to do so,it will loose significant market share as most customers would move to other sellers/firms charging lower price or regular market price.Therefore,the market price is fixed in the perfectly competitive market as the firms do not have price making or market power.Consequently,they are not able to charge different prices to different customers according to their maximum willingness to pay or differences in price preferences.
Answer:
14%
Explanation:
Let IRR from machine be represented with i
Now, $4,120 * Cumulative PV factor (i, 6 periods) = $16,000
Cumulative PV factor (i, 6 periods) = $16,000 / $4,120
Cumulative PV factor (i, 6 periods) = 3.883
Now, we refer to PV factor table, the PV Factor (3.883) falls nearest to i =14%. (See proof in the attached table as attached below)
So therefore, IRR = 14%
So, the machine's internal rate of return is closest to 14%.
Answer: 2. 2. We have identified a problem with our expense sheet, but we will solve it.
3. 2. The user should contact the help center.
4. 1. In the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.
Explanation:
2. By choosing Option 2, the writing is more concise and but still has all the necessary details unlike the other options that are unnecessarily long.
3. Option 2 does not make assumptions like option 1 did which is wrong. Option 3 would be better but the text did not include the bit about the problem this making Option 2 best.
4. Option 1 is the best option because it is clear and concise and eliminates the long lead-in.