If Buchi owns several financial instruments: stocks issued by seven different companies, plus bonds issued by four different companies, her investments are best described as a PORTFOLIO
A range of investments owned by an individual is termed a portfolio.
For instance, when an individual owns different stocks, bonds, and businesses in diverse companies, such an individual is known to have a portfolio.
Portfolios are important for long-term financial goals even though the returns on such portfolios are not immediate.
According to the question, if Buchi owns several financial instruments: stocks issued by seven different companies, plus bonds issued by four different companies, her investments are best described as a PORTFOLIO
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24598517
Answer:
$6,100
Explanation:
The computation of the net income is shown below:
= Service revenue in trial balance + ( unearned revenue × given percentage) - (rent expense in trial balance) + ( Prepaid rent × 2 months ÷ 12 months) - (wages expense in trial balance + adjusted trial balance)
= $5,000 + ($4,000 × 80%) - ($800 + $3,600 × 2 months ÷ 12 months - ($600 + $100)
= $5,000 + $3,200 - $1,400 - $700
= $6,100
Answer:
1) What is the size of Labor force
?
60 people are full time employed + 20 people who are part-time employed + 20 people who are unemployed = 100 people
2) What is the Unemployment rate?
20 people who are unemployed / 100 people = 0.2 or 20%
the unemployment rate includes only those people who do not have a job but are willing and able to work, and are currently looking for one.
The answer would be C worker strikes due to cultural differences
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
