Solution:
Let's start by assuming that the taxi ride demand is extremely elastic, to the extent that it is vertically sluggish! If the cabbies raise the fair price by 10% from 10.00 per mile to 11.00 per kilometre, the number of riders remains 20.
Total income before fair growth= 20* 10= 200.
Total income following fair growth = 11* 20= 220.
A 10% increase in the fare therefore leads to a 10% increase in the driver's revenue.
Therefore, the assumption in this situation is that the cab drivers think the taxi driving requirement is highly inelastic.
The demand curve facing the drivers of the cab is still inelastic, but not vertically bent.
When the rate increased from 10% to 11, riders declined from 20% to 19%
Total revenue before fair growth is 20* 10= 200
The gap between revenue and fair growth is 19* 11= 209
This means that a realistic 10% raise doesn't result in a 10% boost on income Because the market curve for taxi rides is not 100% inelastic, but rather low inelastic, so that a fair increase (control) allows consumers to lose their incomes.
Answer:
communication
Explanation:
communication function of channel intermediaries.
Channel intermediaries are responsible for making sure that the product is available at the appropriate quantities, at the right time and place for end user consumption. They also serve as a means of communication between the consumer and producer concerning such issues as product quality.
Answer: $2,210,000
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that the Baldwin company will sell 100 units (x1000) of capacity from their Baker product line and that each unit of capacity is worth $6 plus $4 per automation rating.
We are further told that the Baldwin company will sell the capacity for 35% off. The amount they'll receive when the capacity is sold will be:
The cost per unit will be
= 6 + (4 × 7)
= 34
The worth of the capacity will now be:
= 100000 × 34
= 3,400,000
The amount received will be:
= 3400000 × (1-35%)
= 3400000 × 0.65
= $2,210,000
Answer:
illegal
Explanation:
According to my research on the rules or regulations that a corporation must follow, it can be said that based on the information provided within the question what was done is illegal. Based on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act every entity titled as a corporation is required by law to have an audit committee. Since one was not created for the Ruis Corporation it is technically an illegal corporation.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
