Answer:
A. checks and balances.
Explanation:c
The US Constitution is based on the Separation of Powers principle, which divides the government power and responsibility into the executive, the judicial and the legislative branches, and which also sets the basis for the Checks and Balances principle, a system whereby all three branches can oversee, influence, control and limit the other to prevent abuses of power and unbalance. The selection of federal judges by the President, the head of the executive branch, is an example of how this system works. However, this process does not stop here, once a federal judge is nominated, then it has to be approved by Congress in order to become a judge. This way, all three branches are involved in this process.
Personally I think they done it because they may have thought it was a blessing from the gods
Answer:
social identity theory.
Explanation:
The social identity theory of the suggestion that an organisation can decide to change the behaviour of individuals if it can bring modifications to their self identity.
It gives specifications and predictions to the situations where people might see themselves as one person or as members of a group.
From this question, we can see that the participants to find themselves based on the group traits to which they belonged. Those that were shared into pulligand defined themselves based on those traits. And nulligans defined themselves based on the nulligan traits.
The concept of <u>Ethical Relativism</u> varies from society to society and deals with the perception of what constitutes right from wrong within that society.
Explanation:
The <u>Theory of Ethical Relativism</u> states that moral objectives are not true and also ,their is no absolute truth in ethics,what is morally wrong and right depends upon the society in which we live and it varies from the perception of one society to another .
<u>Perception</u> pertain to the perspective/point of view of an individual or a society.
Answer:
Tbh is sounds totally like something a 7th grader would write I don't see a problem.
Explanation:
I mean you could make it more wordy but there wouldn't be a really point.