Answer:
Option B) Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 333
p = 48% = 0.48
Alpha, α = 0.01
Number of women belonging to union , x = 149
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a two-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.273079
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that proportion of homes in Oregon that were heated by natural gas is different from what was reported.
B. Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Answer:-5
Step-by-step explanation:
You need to distribute on both sides so u get
9c-15=20-2c
Move variable to left side and change the sign
-9c+2c-15=20
Move constant to right side and change the sign
-9c+2c=20+15
Connect like terms
-7c=35
Divide
C=-5
Answer:
The answer is 4.35, rounded two decimals to hundredths place.
<em>some text here to make the answer slightly longer for some good reasons. yep.</em>
Answer:
243
Step-by-step explanation:
STEP 1: Evaluate the variables
9(2 + (5)(5))
STEP 2: Then from there you can multiply the equation
18 + 225 = 243
