is a classic approximation, true for small x.
The next term in the polynomial expansion will be 
where k is a positive number. So our estimate 1-x is definitely an underestimate on both sides of x=0.
Since for negative xs the exponential rises exponentially and the line only linearly, the exponential exceeds the line for all negative x. For positive x, the line quickly goes negative while the exponential is always positive.
So, there's no interval for which our approximation is an overestimate.
Step-by-step explanation:
#1.
(a + 2b)²
<em>Using identity (x + y)² = x² + 2xy + y², we get:</em>
= (a)² + (2b)² + 2 × (a) × (2b)
= a² + 4b² + 4ab
= a² + 4ab + 4b² Ans.
#2.
(5x - 3y)²
<em>Using identity (a - b)² = a² - 2ab + b², we get:</em>
= (5x)² + (3y)² - 2 × (5x) × (3y)
= 25x² + 9y² - 30xy
= 25x² - 30xy + 9y² Ans.
#3.
(3a + 4)(3a - 4)(9a² + 16)
<em>Using identity (x + y)(x - y) = x² - y², we get:</em>
= [(3a)² - (4)²][9a² + 16]
= (9a² - 16)(9a² + 16)
= (9a²)² - (16)²
= 81a⁴ - 256 Ans.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
There was actually too much work for this on my paper so I can't really show it, but if you can memorize this parent function I would.
It would be .98 feet or 11.81 inches
Answer:
Math is confusing
Step-by-step explanation:
LOL
