The few rule the many. Hope this helped, have a great day! :D
The appropriate response is pictorial graph. A pictograph utilizes picture images to pass on the importance of measurable data. Pictographs ought to be utilized painstakingly on the grounds that the diagrams may, either incidentally or intentionally, distort the information. This is the reason a diagram ought to be outwardly precise.
Answer: Option C.
General,selling and administrative cost cannot be assigned to a cost object.
Explanation:
General, selling and adminstrative cost is the total of both direct and indirect selling cost, administrative cost and all general cost of the organisation. This cost include all the non production cost that they company incured at a specific time bond i.e cost to sell, cost to deliver product and services, rent, cost to manage the company, marketing expenses, salaries, accounting, bonuses e.t.c.
It is not assigned to a cost object because it is general ,cost of selling, and administrative cost.
<span>The Structural Approach to kinesics studies all movement and sees all behaviors as important and communicative, and studies the KINE or the smallest unit of movement or motion. The External Variable approach however must be interpreted for it to be considered communication, and to be studied. Behaviors must also be full and completed, and it studies the KINEMORPH or the combination of lines, and specific whole movements. And it's also distinguished by idiosyncratic and shared info (personal behaviors/tendencies and behaviors with meaning for the particular group).</span>
Answer:
Infinity
Explanation:
In the case when the tea and scones are considered to be the perfect complements also you give preference one cup of tea over the one scone
Plus the indifferent curve with tea should be plotted on the vertical axis
So in the case when there is 2 cups of tea with one scone so at this point, the MRS should be at infinity as the indifference curve should be in downward sloping because we presume that there is preferences done at monotonicity