Answer:
Yes <em>and</em> no.
Patrick <em>would</em> be liable for negligence in <em>allowing</em> the hail damage, as he <em>failed</em> to fulfill his duty of taking reasonable care of the vehicle.
However, he would<em> not</em> be responsible for the hot oil and gravel nicks.
They are similar because relationship amongst police can either affect some and harm others
As she is not fully qualified to do that as it hasn't been property diagnosed and recorded
The use of information to falsely accuse a company such as it occurred when XYZ ran a story that was not related to the restaurant they wanted to accuse is an example of False light (option D)
The false light is:
- A grievance of the laws of the United States that refers to defamation.
- They include a person's right to protection against false publicity to the public.
- This right must be in balance with freedom of expression
According to the above, in the situation, the cable channel XYZ incurred false light because they showed a video of a restaurant chain different from the restaurant chain in which there was an outbreak of E. coli.
Therefore, the chain of restaurants in the video would be affected by defamation because it did not correspond to the case of the E. coli outbreak. So the correct answer is D. False light.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/8512832
