Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Is untrustworthy or could be lying. Looks/sounds suspicious or changed there story
Explanation:
Explanation:
it is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing
Payroll (a) but not 1000% sure
