Answer:
Allocated overhead= $1,430,600
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The company's executives estimated that direct labor would be $3,750,000 (250,000 hours at $15/hour) and that factory overhead would be $1,550,000 for the current period.
The records show that there had been 230,000 hours of direct labor.
Using direct labor hours as a base.
Predetermined overhead rate= total estimated manfacturing overhead for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Predetermined overhead rate= 1555000/250000= $6.22 per hour
Allocated overhead= Predetermined overhead rate*actual hours= 6.22* 230000= $1,430,600
Answer:<em> Negative externality is defined as the cost that is incurred by a individual who isn't involved in the economic transaction.</em>
In the above question, the following is the example of negative externality: <u><em>smoking harms the health of nonsmokers who are nearby.</em></u>
Here, the cost is incurred by the nonsmokers who are standing nearby individuals who prefer smoking. Thus creating negative externality.
<u><em>Therefore, the correct option is (c)</em></u>
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. The two <span>participating countries were benefited by global trade in terms of </span><span>economic growth in both the countries. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
Answer:
E To prevent dumping
Explanation:
There are several arguments that are given to support trade barriers; one of which is to prevent dumping. A country would place embargo on imports with respect to some of the goods that are produced in her country. This is to enable and encourage local production of such goods. Where a country permits importation of goods that are produced locally, such action could being down the efforts of local production ; hence local industries might not thrive in terms of production.
Also, placing embargo on the importation of goods that are produced locally in a country would take away the possibility of making the country for dumping ground in terms of goods that are not up to standard, produced in a foreign country and same would have been imported.
Answer:
The actual unemployment rate was higher during the recession of 1990−1991, while cyclical unemployment was higher in 2001.
Explanation:
Given data in the question
In the year 1990-1991
The natural rate of unemployment = 5.9%
The rate of the actual unemployment = 7.0%
In the year 2001
The natural rate of unemployment = 4.8%
The actual unemployment rate = 6.0%
As we can see that
The actual unemployment is high in the year 1990-1991 i.e 7.0% as compare to the year 2001 i.e 6.0%
While the cyclical unemployment rate is high in 2001 i.e 1.2% (6.0 - 4.8%) as compare to the year 1990-1191 i.e 1.1% (7.0% - 5.9%)
