General Lee was a reasonable leader who was able to incite his men. While, General Grant on the other hand was able to operative use his high-ranking resources and the "workforce"
An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that uses ontology. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. If that organizational structure is true, the argument will provide reasons why God must exist.
I'm pretty sure he would have opposed, due to that if more people came to the growing economy, the government would've wanted to pull higher federal debts to keep the economy growing...
This meaning belongs to "the Monroe doctrine"<span />
