1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lyrx [107]
3 years ago
15

3 Points

History
2 answers:
REY [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court

Vladimir [108]3 years ago
7 0

Simple Answer:

A. That black were inferior and had no rights.

Explanation:

I got the answer from APEX

You might be interested in
3. REASONING
lidiya [134]
I think that voter registration by the other 49 states is required because they want to control who can vote. C
8 0
3 years ago
SOME ONE PLEASE HELP MEEEE!!!
laila [671]
The Jews were inslaved
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. The case of Furman v. Georgia (1972) resulted in a reinterpretation of the meaning of A. excessive bail. B. the right to coun
sesenic [268]
Base on the questions, the possible answers to you following questions, base on my research and further investigation, would be the following:
#1 <span> D. cruel and unusual punishment.</span>
#2 <span>D. create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.

I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have question and further clarification</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I hate online school lol, but pls help I'm easy points
tiny-mole [99]

Something i would do is search each answer and after the sentence i would put true or false yw:))

7 0
3 years ago
Between 1914 and 1923, the
RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The nature of man has not changed since the Fall of man.<br><br> True<br> False
    12·2 answers
  • What did Rudolf Hoess’s testimony at the end of the war suggest about the Final Solution and planned deportation and resettlemen
    15·1 answer
  • Unions sought to improve workers pay and working conditions by
    9·1 answer
  • Which phrase best describes the scramble for Africa?
    7·2 answers
  • Who was the 30th president ?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was an amendment added to the constitution to set presidential term limits?
    13·1 answer
  • What would be an effective claim for this speech?
    15·1 answer
  • True or False: Morocco is separated into different territories of land with tribes often
    5·2 answers
  • Arrange the tiles in chronological order to show how events led to modern-day restrictions on voting rights.
    13·1 answer
  • Which event was a consequence of the enlightenment? (A.pex)
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!