1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lyrx [107]
3 years ago
15

3 Points

History
2 answers:
REY [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court

Vladimir [108]3 years ago
7 0

Simple Answer:

A. That black were inferior and had no rights.

Explanation:

I got the answer from APEX

You might be interested in
During China's three kingdom periods government positions were:
Dmitriy789 [7]
The answer is C :)) hope I helped
4 0
2 years ago
Which statement best completes the table
Pani-rosa [81]
C.) Chamber is part of a bicameral federal legislature
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To what extent did feudalism contribute to the french revolution
Leto [7]

I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.

The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.

Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.

7 0
2 years ago
¿Cuáles eran las 3 reglas que debían seguir los colonos?<br>​
adoni [48]

Answer:

paano ba ito

Explanation:

¿Cuáles eran las 3 reglas que debían seguir los colonos

4 0
2 years ago
National and State Bank policies in the 1830's contributed to: Inflation The Panic of 1837 Increased national debt Depression
Rufina [12.5K]
National and State Bank policies in the 1830's contributed to the Inflation, The panic increased national debt depression because...

1833 - President Jackson  went against the bank by recalling deposits of the federal government, and putting them to state banks. Meaning lots of useless money was being churned out (every bank had a special type of money) and countless loans were being issued without consideration and thought.  During that, federal revenue due to land had greatly increased

<1835 - He used this as an "opening" to pay of the national debts, however, this was quickly demolished

1836 - The congress passed a law that required the federal surplus to be shared to the states in four payments, later on the Jackson Administration started the "Specie Circular"  (where payments for federal land had to be paid in small installments using coins!)

In March 1837, the new elected president: Martin Van Buren had a big job on his hands; there was an festering economic crisis due to the free spirited bank practices in conjunction with crazy credits etc. it wasn't looking good
May 1837; NYC Banks stopped specie payments and with this, this created a new path for a bad economic recession.  Due to this, Van Buren  was under so many factors of pressure, he decided not to stop the Specie Circular.  He created a set of economic proposals (September ) which was a key date; a self reliant treasury congress didn't want to accept.  Meaning the economy plummeted in 1839 and didn't improve until 1843.







4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the Chicago Tribune mean when it warned that “liberty and
    7·1 answer
  • Which characteristic or motivation is not strongly associated with entrepreneurs
    6·2 answers
  • What new technologies were invented to help with exploration?
    6·1 answer
  • Que es el existencialismo
    7·1 answer
  • To maintain good balance in a horizontal relationship you must
    12·1 answer
  • How did the women in the military contribute to the war effort?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the two competing constitutions in Kansas in 1855?
    15·2 answers
  • At the time of the V-E Day celebration,
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement summarizes the Enslaved Persons Clause?
    14·1 answer
  • Aperiod of 100 years is called​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!