1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lyrx [107]
3 years ago
15

3 Points

History
2 answers:
REY [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court

Vladimir [108]3 years ago
7 0

Simple Answer:

A. That black were inferior and had no rights.

Explanation:

I got the answer from APEX

You might be interested in
Which belief or practice is not shared by Buddhism
balandron [24]

the answer is caste system

8 0
3 years ago
Place the following events in chronological order.
Natalija [7]
Gandhi was assassinated
Nehru is elected prime minister and India gains indep.
conflict breaks out at the Sikh golden temple
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
was the trial of tears necessary to advance civilization as president Jackson said, or a cruel injustice to the cherokee
kaheart [24]
This would depend on your beliefs. Personally, I believe it was a cruel injustice to the Cherokee, and that the Trail of Tears was nowhere near necessary to advance civilization. However, this question is asking for your point of view on the matter. Using the information you have learned, reflect on the event and come to your own conclusion. Hope this helped! ^.^
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the oxygen regulator have a positive effect on the EMS?
frez [133]

Answer: The rate of Oxygen flow.

Explanation: ...

4 0
3 years ago
What was the phrase of the revolution in which huge numbers of French people were executed
Rudik [331]

The Reign of Terror or The Terror


- R3KTFORGOOD ☕

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • List five things in your class room that are matter
    9·1 answer
  • Thinking of primary source documents why is using analyzing a primary source preferable to a secondary source? ​
    10·1 answer
  • I need help i can’t find the answer to this ANYWHERE!!! <br><br> PLEASE ILL GIVE YOU BRANILIEST
    6·2 answers
  • What method of manufacturing mad mass production possible
    14·1 answer
  • One of the most significant changes in the political landscape of 17th century England occurs when
    15·1 answer
  • How was popular culture changing and reflecting america?
    13·1 answer
  • Industrialization of the United States
    12·1 answer
  • Hog Butcher for the World,
    8·1 answer
  • According to Thucydides, the members of the league were partly to blame for their situation. They could not leave the league bec
    14·2 answers
  • Witch of the following best illustrates an achievement of classical Indian science
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!