1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nataly862011 [7]
3 years ago
11

Why did King Prithvi Narayan Shah appointed the person favoured by the people as kaji..

History
1 answer:
Delicious77 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Even though King Prithivi Narayan Shah favored Biraj Thapa Magar (Biraj Bakhate) over Kalu Pandey for the post of Kaji (equivalent to prime minister) and Pradhansenapati (Commander in Chief) he chose Kalu Pandey because he was more popular than Biraj Thapa Magar amongst the gorkhali people.

You might be interested in
Cold War <br><br> Can domestic protest affect the outcome of war?
Aleks [24]

Answer:

Answer: People protested against the war by holding marches, demonstrations, teach-ins, and draft resisance and evasion. Soon these protests also turned phyical and violent against anyone who was aligned with the military.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement describes how the crusades affected the relationship between christians of the east and west?
valentina_108 [34]
The correct answer for this question would be option C. The statement that best describes <span>how the crusades affected the relationship between christians of the east and west would be this: t</span>he Crusades increased the divide between the two groups. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.
5 0
3 years ago
What was the name for people who decided not to settle in one place but instead traveled along rail lines during the Depression?
yarga [219]
Answer: Hoboes- was the name of person who were homeless and traveled along rail lines hopping on trains.
6 0
1 year ago
Why do Jews believe that Israel is their homeland?​
kompoz [17]

Answer:

because that was there only safe places

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the government failed its citizens during the holocaust ?
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer: International response to the Holocaust

In the decades since the Holocaust, some national governments, international bodies and world leaders have been criticized for their failure to take appropriate action to save the millions of European Jews, Roma, and other victims of the Holocaust. Critics say that such intervention, particularly by the Allied governments, might have saved substantial numbers of people and could have been accomplished without the diversion of significant resources from the war effort.[1]

Other researchers have challenged such criticism. Some have argued that the idea that the Allies took no action is a myth—that the Allies accepted as many German Jewish immigrants as the Nazis would allow—and that theoretical military action by the Allies, such as bombing the Auschwitz concentration camp, would have saved the lives of very few people.[2] Others have said that the limited intelligence available to the Allies—who, as late as October 1944, did not know the locations of many of the Nazi death camps or the purposes of the various buildings within those camps they had identified—made precision bombing impossible.[3]

In three cases, entire countries resisted the deportation of their Jewish population during the Holocaust. In other countries, notable individuals or communities created resistance during the Holocaust.

Explanation: American Restrictions on Immigration

America’s traditional policy of open immigration had ended when Congress enacted restrictive immigration quotas in 1921 and 1924. The quota system allowed only 25,957 Germans to enter the country every year. After the stock market crash of 1929, rising unemployment caused restrictionist sentiment to grow, and President Herbert Hoover ordered vigorous enforcement of visa regulations. The new policy significantly reduced immigration; in 1932 the United States issued only 35,576 immigration visas.

State Department officials continued their restrictive measures after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s inauguration in March 1933. Although some Americans sincerely believed that the country lacked the resources to accommodate newcomers, the nativism of many others reflected the growing problem of anti-Semitism.

Of course, American anti-Semitism never approached the intensity of Jew-hatred in Nazi Germany, but pollsters found that many Americans looked upon Jews unfavorably. A much more threatening sign was the presence of anti-Semitic leaders and movements on the fringes of American politics, including Father Charles E. Coughlin, the charismatic radio priest, and William Dudley Pelley’s Silver Shirts.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does this help to explain the variations in dissemination of chinese culture among the regions?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the Apache choose that response to the Army’s request for a meeting in 1883? Select all that apply. The Apache trusted a
    10·2 answers
  • Which conquistador gained control of the Inca Empire? What country is it today?
    9·1 answer
  • How did Andrew Jackson change the presidency?  ​
    5·1 answer
  • Please list them in chronological order please quick The Dutch capture Malacca City. The Portuguese capture Malacca City and mak
    15·1 answer
  • What is the name of the set laws developed in mesopotamia
    15·1 answer
  • Why were social clubs like the prince hall masons important early civil rights organizations in Oklahoma
    5·2 answers
  • -Conclusion - What happened after Nelson Mandela was released? Was the UN intervention positive or negative? (Be sure to mention
    15·1 answer
  • Meadows<br> Which country did Haiti deciare independence from?*
    9·1 answer
  • Which letter on the map represents the Carpathian Mountains?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!