The Great Compromise of 1787 was a meeting about issues in the government and how they were going to be set up properly. This resolved the issue of representation in government and ended up agreeing on proportional government for the upper and lower house.
The obvious answer would be business leaders. The reason why this is true is becaus business leaders were often the ones who were touting the ideas of social darwinism and how their company is better and will stomp out the smaller one in proper sociodarwinistic fashion.
The Connecticut Compromise<span> (also known as the </span>Great Compromise<span> of 1787 or Sherman </span>Compromise<span>) was an agreement that both large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States
</span>
During the late nineteenth century, the equal protection clause was severely limited in scope by the supreme court.
The Fourteenth amendment's Equal Protection Clause requires states to practice equal protection. Equal protection suggests a nation govern impartially—no longer draw distinctions between people completely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objective.
The equal protection Clause is part of the first phase of the Fourteenth change to the American constitution. The clause took impact in 1868.
The equal protection Clause of the 14th amendment prohibits states from denying any individual inside its jurisdiction the equal safety of the law. In different phrases, the laws of a state must treat an individual in an identical manner as other humans in comparable conditions and occasions.
Learn more about the Clause here brainly.com/question/2232307
#SPJ4
