Answer:
Structured analytic techniques (SATs) are the ways which coherent thought are analysed in a systematic and transparent way so as to share and be critiqued by others.
Intuition Assessment on the other hand, is the way a person reacts to his Intuition and chooses to act on them.
SATs are more useful when it comes to analytical or logical decisions while IA is useful in making in the spot decision based on gut feelings.
NO. The company should not <span>alter its marketing campaigns to reflect biases that might be prevalent in various countries in which the company does business. Especially if the alteration made is against company polity and ethics.
The marketing campaigns must represent the authentic stance of the company. It should be presented in such a way that it gives out positive responses from clients and potential clients regardless of market sector.
</span>
Answer:
hope this helps
Assume that you hold a well-diversified portfolio that has an expected return of 11.0% and a beta of 1.20. You are in the process of buying 1,000 shares of Alpha Corp at $10 a share and adding it to your portfolio. Alpha has an expected return of 21.5% and a beta of 1.70. The total value of your current portfolio is $90,000. What will the expected return and beta on the portfolio be after the purchase of the Alpha stock? Do not round your intermediate calculations.
Old portfolio return
11.0%
Old portfolio beta
1.20
New stock return
21.5%
New stock beta
1.70
% of portfolio in new stock = $ in New / ($ in old + $ in new) = $10,000/$100,000=
10%
New expected portfolio return = rp = 0.1 × 21.5% + 0.9 × 11% =
12.05%
New expected portfolio beta = bp = 0.1 × 1.70 + 0.9 × 1.20 =
1.25
Explanation:
Answer:
Im on a private jet eating popeyes chicken, i be flexing like im eating popeyes spinach
Explanation:
plato users
If the severity of risk is low and the frequency of the risk event occurring is high thanwe should Avoid the risk.
High Frequency/ High Severity- Risks are almost certain to occur and when they occur impact will be very high. In such a case it is best to use Avoidance as a risk management technique. If avoidance is not possible then prevention and insurance techniques can be considered. High frequency/ Low severity- This more serious risk and occurrence is high but the impact is low. Examples of such risks include workers’ injuries and shoplifting. A common way to manage this type of risk is through Prevention.
Low frequency/ High severity- The impact of these kinds of risks is very high and can bankrupt a business. Insurance is the best technique to manage these risks that have low loss frequency and high loss severity. Low frequency/ Low severity- Retaining and self-insuring the risk. Risk occurrence is low and impact is also very low. In most cases, the costs of managing them outweigh the cost of retaining them.
Learn more about risk frequency here:- brainly.com/question/254161
#SPJ4