Answer:
The reasons that most likely could change the interpretation of a historical event are:
New evidence is discovered.
Oversights and errors are corrected.
New technology is applied to evidence.
Explanation:
The reasons behind this are that if we discover new evidence or new technology is applied to the evidence, they can provide us unknown details about the phenomenon. A different method of research might discover that the data we had gathered was wrong or that may be a weak lead s strengthen and we confirm that deduction. Also, errors in the study can change the perspective, like the color, date, elements involved, presence of different materials in the piece of evidence evaluated. So, they can have an impact in our perspective, while opinions and lost evidence won't change our perspective because if it is stolen we would have a record to sustain our thesis, while if new opinions appear they would be subject to evidence, a simple opinion is not enough to change a perspective.
