Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
b. You could increase the chances of your current traffic choosing to convert and move down your funnel
Explanation:
This has the ability over time to significantly lower the cost of acquiring a customer and to have a positive impact on your return on investment.
Answer:
Jackie owns the property until Maria dies
Explanation:
In this specific scenario, Jackie owns the property until Maria dies. That is because, in common law and statutory law, a life estate also known as life tenancy is defined as the ownership of land for the duration of a person's life. Therefore since Mike granted life estate to Maria and not Jackie, the land is legally Maria's to do as she wishes up until the moment of her death. Once this comes to pass the land ownership is returned to Mike.
Answer:
cost of equity is 11.60 %
Explanation:
Given data
cost of capital = 10.9 percent
tax rate = 35 percent
earnings = $21,800
bonds outstanding = $25,000
rate = 6 %
to find out
cost of equity
solution
we will find first value of unlevered
value of unlevered = earning ( 1 - tax rate ) / cost of capital
value of unlevered = 21800 ( 1 - 0.35 ) / 0.109 = $130000
so
value of unlevered will be for firm = 130000 × bond outstanding × tax rate
value of unlevered will be for firm = 130000 × 25000 × 35%
value of unlevered will be for firm = $138750
so value of firm will be = bond outstanding + equity
so equity will be = 138750 - 25000
equity = $113750
so now
cost of equity will be = cost of capital + ( cost of capital - rate) (bonds / equity ) ( 1 - tax rate )
cost of equity will be = 10.9%+ ( 10.9 % - 6%) (25000 / 113750 ) ( 1-0.35)
so cost of equity = 11.60 %
Answer:
Governments that are interested in minimizing the efficiency costs of taxation should only tax goods where demand or supply, or both, are relatively inelastic.
Explanation:
hope this helps