Answer:
A principal-agent game.
Explanation:
The principal-agent problem is a conflict in priorities between the owner of an asset and the person to whom control of the asset has been delegated.
The problem can occur in many situations, from the relationship between a client and a lawyer to the relationship between stockholders and a CEO.
Resolving a principal-agent problem may require changing the system of rewards in order to align priorities or improving the flow of information or both
Answer:
e. influencer
Explanation:
Influencer -
Is a person , that influences other person for any task like , work , dressing style , makeup etc , is known as an influencer .
Hence , from the question ,
The engineers of the Raycom construction plays the role of influencer in the company's buying center .
Therefore , from the question ,
the correct term for the given statement is e. influencer .
Answer:
$334,101.43
Explanation:
The computation of the value of this company is shown below:
Value of unlevered firm= [$63,300 × (1 - 23%)] ÷ 14.7%
= $331,571.43
And,
Value of this company = 331,571.43 + 23% of $11,000
= $331,571.43 + $2,530
= $334,101.43
As we know that value of the company is the mix o f levered firm and the unlevered firm according to that we done the calculations
Answer:
3%
Explanation:
real interest rate ≈ nomial interest rate - inflation
ratereal interest rate ≈ 6 - 3 ≈ 3%
Please mark as brainliest if you find this useful, I need it to rank up
Answer:
DeBondt and Thaler (1985) found that the poorest-performing stocks in one time period experienced <em>good</em> performance in the following period and that the best-performing stocks in one time period experienced <em>poor</em> performance in the following time period.
Explanation:
DeBondt and Thaler carried out a study that examined stocks of 35 worst and best performing firms over a previous five-year period.The study showed that over the following three-year period, the firms that were previously performing poorly performed better than the former best performing firms, by an average of 25%.This reversal in the fortunes of stocks of firms in the following period is called the Reversal Effect.