When a full set of general-purpose financial statements are presented, comprehensive income and its components should (D) be presented as part of the Income Statement or as a separate financial statement following the Income Statement.
<h3>Comprehensive income and its components:</h3>
- Comprehensive income and its components should be reported as part of the Income Statement or as a separate financial statement after the Income Statement when a full set of general-purpose financial statements is furnished.
- Net income (or loss) plus/minus other comprehensive income items, which may include, for a period: (a) a minimum pension liability adjustment, (b) any unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale investments, (c) a foreign currency translation adjustment and gain/loss on the related hedge, and (d) the effective portion of cash flow hedges.
- For-profit entities are required by US GAAP to report comprehensive income and its components for a period (unless the entity has no other comprehensive income) in one of two statements:
- In the form of a separate "Statement of Comprehensive Income"
- Or when paired with the Income Statement, a "Statement of Net Income and Comprehensive Income" is produced.
Therefore, when a full set of general-purpose financial statements are presented, comprehensive income and its components should (D) be presented as part of the Income Statement or as a separate financial statement following the Income Statement.
Know more about comprehensive income here:
brainly.com/question/19908089
#SPJ4
The correct question is given below:
When a full set of general-purpose financial statements are presented, comprehensive income and its components should:
A. Appear below income from continuing operations in the Income Statement.
B. Reported net of related income tax effect, in total and individually.
C. Appear in a supplemental schedule in the notes to the financial statements.
D. Be presented as part of the Income Statement or as a separate financial statement following the Income Statement.
Answer:
I actually do think that people will stop buying this type of food from time to time because if it has calories added into it then it will make the price of the food go up and I don’t think that people would like that.For example, most people that are trying to keep their diet equal aren't going to buy this for two reasons.The first reason is because they don’t want to gain more calories and the second reason is because they don’t want to pay extra for calories.And to answer the question about the big mac, the price of it is just $13.20 and it just depends on how many calories are in there to add more to the price of the food. That's my answer to this question.
Explanation:
Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.
Hello there,
<span>C. managing executive recruitment and retention.
Your correct answer above all the option's would be "C". This is one thing that a manger does not manage.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen</span>
Answer:
$16,379.75
Explanation:
Calculation for the annual payments that should be made
Using financial calculator to find the PMT
FV = $100,000
Interest rate = 10%
N= 5 years
PMT?
Hence,
PMT = $16,379.75
Therefore the annual payments that should be made so that both forms of payment are equivalent will be $16,379.75