Answer:
The Supreme Court's opinion in the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954 legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. Originally named after Oliver Brown, the first of many plaintiffs listed in the lower court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the landmark decision actually resolved six separate segregation cases from four states, consolidated under the name Brown v. Board of Education. While the attorneys originally argued the cases on appeal to the Court in 1952, the featured document, School Segregation Cases - Order of Argument, offers a window into the three days in December of 1953 during which the attorneys reargued the cases.
A reargument was necessary because the Court desired briefs from both sides that would answer five questions, all having to do with the attorneys' opinions on whether or not Congress had segregation in public schools in mind when the 14th amendment was ratified. The document lists the names of each case, the states from which they came, the order in which the Court heard them, the names of the attorneys for the appellants and appellees, the total time allotted for arguments, and the dates over which the arguments took place.
The first case listed, Briggs v. Elliott, originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the fall of 1950. Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law. Briggs featured social science testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs from some of the nation's leading child psychologists, such as Dr. Kenneth Clark, whose famous doll study concluded that segregation negatively affected the self-esteem and psyche of African-American children. Such testimony was groundbreaking because on only one other occasion in U.S. history had a plaintiff attempted to present such evidence before the Court.
Explanation:
A public area represents works whose intellectual property rights have been extended or works that have been released by means of the author's false.
The definition of an intellectual is a person greater inquisitive about logic as opposed to emotions. An example of an intellectual is a scientist.
When matters are perceived intellectually, then they are looked at from the aware mind and ordinary awareness, because of this a quantifiable, logical, outside angle concerning a number of mental "doing" = questioning, comparing, concluding, reasoning and planning.
Intellectual skills seek advice from the ways of questioning and problem-fixing utilized by experts in a discipline. A fashionable highbrow skill is vital to all fields of taking a look at is essential wondering. highbrow capacity consists of memory, verbal comprehension, reasoning, analysis, hassle-fixing, and reasoning abilities.
Learn more about Intellectual here:
brainly.com/question/1078532
#SPJ4
Answer:
The remnant of an estate that has been conveyed to take effect and be enjoyed after the termination of a prior estate, as when an owner conveys a life estate to one party and the remainder to another, is called:
B) the remainder estate
Explanation:
- The option A is not correct as the right of survivorship is a feature of joint ownership of properties. It states that if a person dies in a joint ownership of a property which has right of survivorship then the other person get the share of the deceased person in the property.
- The option B is correct as the remainder estate that is such estate that is left from the life estate on the termination of a prior estate.
- The option C is incorrect as the reversionary right is such right according to which a property is reverted back on a specific event to the previous owner or the heirs of that owner if deceased.
- The option D is also incorrect as the reversionary interest is such a interest that is reverted back to the grantor or his/her heirs.
According to the textbook, Judicial Review is the most influential check on the supreme court provided by the other branches.
- The Supreme Court's most well-known power, judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act to be in violation of the Constitution, is not mentioned in the language of the Constitution itself. This theory was established by the Court in the decision of Marbury v. Madison.
- Judicial review is the Supreme Court's authority to examine whether the legislative and executive branches' actions are consistent with the Constitution, and to declare them null and void if they are not.
- The power to alter the Constitution, make new laws, approve the president's selection of judges, restrict the number of justices on the Supreme Court, and impeach judges guilty of treason, bribery, other highcrime are the principal balances on the judiciary.
Thus the answer is Judicial Review.
Refer here to learn more about Judicial Review: brainly.com/question/14027482
#SPJ4
