Answer:
terry v. ohio
Explanation:
Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."
Answer:
I agree with the decision of the case because in the declaration of independence paragraph two it states, "All men are created equal." it would be unconstitutional for schools to be separated based on the color of there skin. I wouldnt have done anything differently if I were a judge of the supreme court because I would know that it violates the the 14 Amendment.
Answer:
No, it would not be legal.
Explanation:
It would be a violation of US law if Congress allowed a United States territory to become a complete state on the condition that its residents choose a new governor. This is because the US Federal Congress is prohibited from limiting the independence, sovereignty and management of a state over its territories. Thus, allowing a territory to become a complete state is a way of limiting state political power within that territory, which means that it is illegal.
You basically have to write a summary in your opinion about the student privacy and searches for all local high schools.
Payroll (a) but not 1000% sure
