Answer:
<u><em>The answer is</em></u>: <u>The result of finding face 4444% of the time is not possible.</u>
<u />
Explanation:
If we start from 190190 rolls, and the student says she has 4444% = 44.44; in which the result is expensive, multiplying it by the throws results in: 190190 x 44.44 = 8452043.6; something that is impossible since the coin toss has been less than the amount in which the student claims to have obtained face as a result.
<u><em>The answer is</em></u>: <u>The result of finding face 4444% of the time is not possible.</u>
A constitutional provision that is common to both Brandenburg v. Ohio (1968) and Schenck v. united states (1919) is the first amendment clause.
<h3>What is the constitution?</h3>
A constitution is a fundamental document that defines rules and regulations, laws and legislation as well as the power and authority of the government to conduct the functioning of any country.
As plaintiffs in both Brandenburg v. Ohio (1968) and Schenck v. United States (1919) cases were alleged to have made anti-government comments under this provision, the first amendment clause is the part of the cases that they have in common.
Learn more about Constitution, here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
Answer:
C) Group polarization
Explanation:
According to studies conducted by various sociologists, it can be said that this scenario provides an example of Group Polarization. This term refers to when groups make decisions that are far more extreme than what the members actually decide individually. Which is the case in this scenario since seperately they believe that Ms. Akey may be a better teacher but are not totally convinced. While together they believe that Ms. Akey is a far better (extreme) teacher.
Answer:
Dahil pinagaaralan ng mabuti,dumadaan sa mahabang proseso bago ipatupad ang isang batas.
Explanation:
hope it helps hehehehehhehehehehe
True. It tells of his First Advent, as far as i remember, at least.