Answer:
Free will and self-actualization
Explanation:
The humanistic approach to psychology emphasizes free will and self-actualization
Answer:
When someone who didn't study for the exam blame his inability to pass the exam on his luck.
Explanation:
Attribution error occurs when people diver the cause of a situation that supposed to be internal into something external.
In the example above, the reason why that student fail the exam is because he come to the exam room unprepared. But rather than acknowledging his mistake, he rather blame all of it on luck (which is outside of his control) in order to protect his own ego. In such situation, that student has comitted an attribution error.
Answer:
Performance management process is a communication process whereby managers and employees communicate and work together to plan, monitor and review an employee's performance on the job, and to identify if an employee is working according to their job objectives and overall contribution to the organization. This involves planning, coaching, training and improving.
Performance Management is linked to employee selection because, it tells the job objectives and selecting the best candidate who's records fits in best to the job objectives.
Performance Management helps to identify the aspect an employee need to improve on, by going through the employee performance and noting the areas the employee has not been performing very well. For instance an employee may be perfect in lab samples, but very poor in writing a lab reports, the management will take such employee for a training to build his/her performance.
Performance Management helps to develop an employee because it helps to train an employee on a recent technology, and build the employee to diverse knowledge. It also develop the employee by coaching them on the job, so their learn more on the job.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
