Voters and policymakers in many countries have made the <u>normative </u>judgment that monopolies are usually a bad thing.
Normative Judgement refers to a judgement that is given by the jurisdiction which is agreed by all the people. It is a kind of solution statement to any problem. In the case of monopolies countries gave normative judgement because monopolies at a larger extent are not good for the local market of the country. If any particular company monopolizes the market regarding a particular product, then the consumers will buy that product from only that company and not anywhere else. This reduces competition in the market as the local sellers loose their consumers and livelihood. However, monopolies are a part of the market because monopoly at a normal level is necessary as their will be so many sellers of the same product in the market and consumers will get confused.
Learn more about Monopoly at:
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ4
Europe and a sliver of Asia near like Greece
She will no longer believe that all athletes are stupid because she has been proven wrong by Patrick breaking the stereotype into pieces. She may consider rephrasing her belief into 'some athletes' or ' most athletes' instead of 'all athletes' because Patrick is an obvious exception.
The correct answer is D) being obedient to the will of God
A and B are incorrect as there is only one true prophet according to the belief system, while C is incorrect because being a nomad is not a necessity, but still happens.
Answer:
Utilitarian decision making
Explanation:
She would make use of the utilitarian decision making which involves taking the decision which will least harm the people involved.
In Jessica’s case she would have to consider all her options and see which is the least harmful. If she were to turn in her paper as it is, she might get a bad grade, but she would be solely affected. If she decides to buy a paper, she could continue to take care of her grandmother and would guarantee her a good grade. If the teacher finds out she didn’t write the paper or it was plagiarized it could cause harm to her academic integrity. If she were to explain the whole thing to the teacher the next day, they might just give her an extension; if she were to buy a paper, then it wouldn’t be her honest work.
It is advisable for Jessica to just keep the paper she has and turn that in. It would be better for Jessica to be honest than cheating and buying someone else’s work.
