1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
11

Why did the British government need money after the mid-1700s?

Law
1 answer:
Musya8 [376]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Seven Years War (French and Indian War)

Explanation:

In the mid 1700s, the French and Indian war broke out. This war lasted about 9 years. 1754 to 1763. After the war, the British Parliament was heavily in debt and needed money. Britain decided it would be a good idea to exploit the American colonies for money since the colonies were under British control.

You might be interested in
Which is the only program that covers nursing home care?
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

the answer is b , Medicaid

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.

Explanation:

the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.

have a good day

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 3 of Preserve Evidence law
jonny [76]

Answer:

The evidence that must be preserved is limited to evidence that would be both material and exculpatory. Evidence is material if it is relevant to an important issue in the case, and evidence is exculpatory if it supports a defense or tends to show that the defendant is not guilty of the crime.

Explanation:

This might not answer your question, but this was from the wedsite below......

https://www.justia.com

8 0
3 years ago
What did Wayne Williams say he was doing on the bridge?
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

heard a "big loud splash", suggesting that something had been thrown from the bridge into the river below. The first automobile to exit the bridge after the splash, at roughly 3 a.m., belonged to Williams. When stopped and questioned, he told police that he was on his way to check on an address in a neighboring town ahead of an audition the following morning with a young singer named Cheryl Johnson. However, both the phone number he gave police and Cheryl Johnson turned out to be fictitious.

Explanation:

hope this helped u !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Learning reality, responsible behavior, and the ability to distinguish right from wrong
Kryger [21]

Answer:

whats the question?

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you think anything from your vehicle check could affect your safety or ability to control your car, you should _____.
    6·1 answer
  • In the state of Florida, you can only be given a ticket for not wearing a seat belt if you have been pulled over for some other
    6·1 answer
  • How can a 33 year old fingerprint still match the person who left it?
    5·1 answer
  • "In American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, American Express (Amex) entered into agreements with Italian Colors Restauran
    6·1 answer
  • Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why
    13·1 answer
  • The people living within a riding are called
    6·1 answer
  • Shortly after your 18th birthday you assigned your first jury summons you've been asked to serve on the jury for a federal court
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be considered a reasonable accommodation for
    7·1 answer
  • Which sentence best summarizes how the First Amendment protects freedom of expression?
    12·1 answer
  • Some attorneys contact many experts as a ploy to disqualify them or prevent opposing counsel from hiring them; this practice is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!