1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
2 years ago
12

Richard is starting a new security service. He tells his attorney, Kiera, that while he plans to prohibit all acts of discrimina

tion and harassment, he cannot be all places at all times. Richard asks Kiera if there is anything he can do to limit his liability. What should she tell him? a. She should tell him that there is nothing he can do because under the law, he is automatically liable for any acts of harassment committed by supervisors. b. She should tell him that he should take advantage of a loophole in Title VII that allows business owners to opt out of the harassment provisions of Title VII. c. She should tell him that he should have a policy provided to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct, and that an unreasonable failure by an employee to take advantage of corrective opportunities offered through the policy would help him avoid liability. d. She should tell him that he has nothing to worry about because as long as he has a rule prohibiting harassment, he cannot be held liable for acts of supervisors.
Law
2 answers:
aleksley [76]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

c. She should tell him that he should have a policy provided to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct, and that an unreasonable failure by an employee to take advantage of corrective opportunities offered through the policy would help him avoid liability.

Explanation:

This is most likely what Kiera should tell Richard. It is true that employers are generally liable for cases of discrimination and harassment at their own place of business. This is because such cases often indicate a lack of overview and proper management. However, one way to avoid such liability would be by having a policy offered to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct.

aksik [14]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is D. She should tell him that he should have a policy provided to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct, and that an unreasonable failure by an employee to take advantage of corrective opportunities offered through the policy would help him avoid liability

Explanation:

By legal standard and company structure, there on what should are various policies that are documented and given to a new employees  after formally been engaged by the company. These policies defines what the company will do when issues arises.

Hence, the idea Kiera telling Richard to develop a written policy on all acts of discrimination and harassment, exonerates him and his company from all issues associated with all sorts of discrimination and harassment.

You might be interested in
By Day 3, post a state or local legal tenet that has come under fire for potentially violating a constitutionally protected free
Eduardwww [97]

A state law that has come under fire for violating a constitutionally protected freedom or right is the case of <em>Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (2017)</em>.

This case held that a Missouri program that denied a grant to a religious school, while providing grants to similarly situated non-religious groups violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.

3 0
2 years ago
Which best explains how the president selects a justice for the Supreme Court?
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

The President nominates someone for a vacancy on the Court and the Senate votes to confirm the nominee, which requires a simple majority. In this way, both the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal government have a voice in the composition of the Supreme Court.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
2 years ago
As a Police Chief and a servant of God, you need to help restore order to your community. What do you need to discuss with these
madam [21]

Being the new Police Chief and also a servant of God I would first remind myself that I never want to force my beliefs, but I also. ... With that in mind I would begin discussing with the community leaders what their main ... However, in order to restore order in my community it would be essential to treat the problems that the ...

8 0
2 years ago
Who or which entity initiates criminal proceedings?
Lynna [10]

Answer:The answer is the defendant

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why have some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches? What historical laws gave this right to states?
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think people shoplift? Why do so many teens shoplift? List three reasons.
    6·2 answers
  • Who might be contacted in a background check of a police applicant?
    7·2 answers
  • A John Hopkins study showed that the states with the strictest graduated licensing requirements have a 20% decrease in teen fata
    5·1 answer
  • Questions about marriages? Can you get married with the same person twice In a year? Like could you get married at court first t
    6·2 answers
  • Would you consent to a search by police even if you believe that they had no evidence to indicate that you did anything wrong? W
    7·2 answers
  • She's just a girl and she's on fire
    11·1 answer
  • Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
    15·2 answers
  • Let's be the friends​
    12·1 answer
  • for states to pass a law that also happens to restrict religious practices, the law must have what type of aim or purpose?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!