First question: D- people who were living in America at the time, didn't want other people to come in and "steal their jobs". To me, nativism (at the time) was a pretty stupid thing, considering how many of the people who didn't want anyone else coming into the country, were immigrants themselves.
Second question: D is the closest answer, seeing as Roosevelt wanted to improve relations with Central and South America.
Hope this helps!
- Deprived women of individual rights
- Reduced the rights of illegitimate children
By applying the sine trigonometry, the value of leg s is equal to: F. 8 units.
<h3>How to apply basic trigonometry?</h3>
In order to determine the value of leg s, we would apply basic trigonometry. From the diagram of the right-angled triangle shown above, we can deduce the following parameters:
Next, we would use the sine trigonometry to determine the value of leg s:
Sinθ = Opp/Hyp
Sin45 = s/8√2
1/√2 = s/8√2
s√2 = 8√2
s = (8√2)/√2
s = 8 units.
Read more on sine trigonometry here: brainly.com/question/20367642
#SJP1
Dear Editor,
I want to draw your attention towards the key strengths that the patriots have which may, according to me, lead them to a victory in war of independence.
The first important thing to consider is the war strategy that the patriots and the British have adopted. I understand the patriots have neither a naval power nor a specialized army. However, the strength here is the suffering of the desertion rates by the army which, I think, will pretty much pay them back positively.
Secondly, the deployment of the famous Fabian Strategy by Gen. Washington will yield fruitful results for the patriots. This is because it directly targets the Hudson Highland Strategy of the British without necessarily involving in conventional battle.
Thirdly, I think the alliance with France is of paramount importance here; Morgan successfully managed to lure Cornwallis in after the Battle of Cowpens in the year 1781. Due to all of these key strengths, I believe the patriots will win the war of independence.
Regards,
XYZ.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
To be effective, an incident action plan should focus on addressing future time frames known as operational periods. Also taking the following into consideration.
-Be proactive
-Specify the incident objectives
-State the activities to be completed
-Assign responsibilities
-Identify needed resources
-Specify communication protocols
In order to be effective, an incident command action plan should contain a specified timeframe otherwise it is possible that goals are repeatedly postponed and these could lead to the goals not being executed. Thus the given statement is true.
