1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lubov Fominskaja [6]
3 years ago
11

Which was one result of China's isolation from the rest of the world?

History
2 answers:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
3 0
I think it might be B
Salsk061 [2.6K]3 years ago
3 0
<span>C. Development in China fell behind Europe.
</span>
You might be interested in
Why did so many African countries face difficult challenges after winning their independence?
-BARSIC- [3]
<h3>One of the most pressing challenges African states faced at Independence was their lack of infrastructure. European imperialists prided themselves on bringing civilization and developing Africa, but they left their former colonies with little in the way of infrastructure. The empires had built roads and railroads - or rather, they had forced their colonial subjects to build them - but these were not intended to build national infrastructures. Imperial roads and railways were almost always intended to facilitate the export of raw materials. Many, like the Ugandan Railroad, ran straight to the coastline. </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h3>These new countries also lacked the manufacturing infrastructure to add value to their raw materials. Rich as many African countries were in cash crops and minerals, they could not process these goods themselves. Their economies were dependent on trade, and this made them vulnerable. They were also locked into cycles of dependencies on their former European masters. They had gained political, not economic dependencies, and as Kwame Nkrumah - the first prime minister and president of Ghana - knew, political independence without economic independence was meaningless.  </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Energy Dependence</h2><h3>The lack of infrastructure also meant that African countries were dependent on Western economies for much of their energy. Even oil-rich countries did not have the refineries needed to turn their crude oil into gasoline or heating oil. Some leaders, like Kwame Nkrumah, tried to rectify this by taking on massive building projects, like the Volta River hydroelectric dam project. The dam did provide much-needed electricity, but its construction put Ghana heavily into debt. The construction also required the relocation of tens of thousands of Ghanaians and contributed to Nkrumah's plummeting support in Ghana. In 1966, Nkrumah was overthrown.  </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Inexperienced Leadership</h2><h3>At Independence, there were several presidents, like Jomo Kenyatta, had several decades of political experience, but others, like Tanzania's Julius Nyerere, had entered the political fray just years before independence. There was also a distinct lack of trained and experienced civil leadership. The lower echelons of the colonial government had long been staffed by African subjects, but the higher ranks had been reserved for white officials. The transition to national officers at independence meant there were individuals at all levels of the bureaucracy with little prior training. In some cases, this led to innovation, but the many challenges that African states faced at independence were often compounded by the lack of experienced leadership. </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Lack of National Identity</h2><h3>The borders Africa's new countries were left with were the ones drawn in Europe during the Scramble for Africa with no regard to the ethnic or social landscape on the ground. The subjects of these colonies often had many identities that trumped their sense of being, for instance, Ghanaian or Congolese. Colonial policies that privileged one group over another or allocated land and political rights by "tribe" exacerbated these divisions. The most famous case of this was the Belgian policies that crystallized the divisions between Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda that led to the tragic genocide in 1994. </h3><h3> </h3><h3>Immediately after decolonization, the new African states agreed to a policy of inviolable borders, meaning they would not try to redraw Africa's political map as that would lead to chaos. The leaders of these countries were, thus, left with the challenge of trying to forge a sense of national identity at a time when those seeking a stake in the new country were often playing to individuals' regional or ethnic loyalties.  </h3><h3> </h3><h2>Cold War</h2><h3>Finally, decolonization coincided with the Cold War, which presented another challenge for African states. The push and pull between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) made non-alignment a difficult, if not impossible, option, and those leaders who tried to carve third way generally found they had to take sides.  </h3><h3> </h3><h3>Cold War politics also presented an opportunity for factions that sought to challenge the new governments. In Angola, the international support that the government and rebel factions received in the Cold War led to a civil war that lasted nearly thirty years. </h3><h3> </h3><h3>These combined challenges made it difficult to establish strong economies or political stability in Africa and contributed to the upheaval that many (but not all!) states faced between the late '60s and late '90s. </h3>
7 0
3 years ago
Is the reasoning in the Preamble and Bill of Rights presented logically? PLEASE HELP
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

They did that just to show that they're in independent country

6 0
2 years ago
The process of adding amendments to the U.S. Constitution is meant to
zhannawk [14.2K]
The Constitution<span> provides that an </span>amendment<span> may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a </span>constitutional<span> convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Sam Houston made treaties with the Native Americans, what did the treaties entail?
cricket20 [7]

In an effort to prevent any alliances between the Cherokee Indians and the Mexicans, the Federal Government sent Sam Houston and John Forbes to the territories occupied by the Native Americans in order to negotiate the boundaries in which they could peacefully settle. These negotiations ended with a treaty on February 23, 1836. However, this document was rejected by the Senate because it considered the consultation had exceeded its powers by offering land grants to the Cherokees. Houston decided to disregard this and maintained the kept the treaty made with the Indians. However, President Mirabeau B. Lamar would ultimately agree with the Senate's interpretations and leave the treaty without effect.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How long did Kush rule Egypt?<br> 86 years <br> 84 years<br> 88 years<br> 90 years
zubka84 [21]

Answer:

The kush rule egypt is 800 years

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the name of the convention that caused President Monroe to issue the Monroe Doctrine?
    11·1 answer
  • What factor of production is used by manufacturing firms for a physical location?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these was NOT a
    9·2 answers
  • Which is not considered a technological improvement that helped connect Hawaii to the rest of the nation?
    6·2 answers
  • Who decides what is valuable in a culture?
    12·1 answer
  • What life was like during the Ancient Roman days.
    14·1 answer
  • Why do you think Washington was so concerned about these two issues?
    9·1 answer
  • Summarize what you learn and be sure to answer these questions:
    11·1 answer
  • Which is in the correct order? A. Bill becomes a law. B. Law becomes a bill
    7·2 answers
  • Someone who wants extreme changes in government
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!