1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flauer [41]
3 years ago
7

how would walls affect people who get isolated in a country and those people who get excluded from in entering the country

History
1 answer:
Verdich [7]3 years ago
6 0

Walls are extremely limiting, both for people left outside and for people inside of the walled area.

For people who are isolated within a country, the effect can be that of not knowing much about the outside world. An isolated country is also at high risk for dictatorships and autocracies, as people are more easily manipulated and cannot leave the country if they are unhappy. On the other hand, for those who are not allowed to enter the country, the risk can be being unable to enjoy the benefits of that country, being unable to reunite with people in that territory and being unable to discover what the country has to offer. A good example is that of North Korea, and the fact that South Koreans have often been unable to reunite with their families due to strict travel controls (although not precisely a wall).

You might be interested in
What was unusual about the outcome of the 2000 presidential election??
kirill [66]
I'm going to be honest that I'm not 100% sure with my answer but, one of the candidates had a lower popular vote (the people) and the other candidate had a higher electoral vote (the representive vote) and although the candidate didn't have the popular vote, they still won due to the electoral votes.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did the United States go to war against Iraq in 2003?
Sidana [21]

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

Their main reason to go to war in a strategically-led coalition was to disarm and neutralize Iraq's threat with the weapons they held. It can be said that A was also a reason that such happened, but the primary reason was because of Saddam Hussein's government that held such weapons which was deemed a threat to the entire world.

6 0
3 years ago
Why was the Sherman Antitrust Act unsuccessful?
marshall27 [118]

Answer:

There are several reasons why the Sherman Antitrust Act was ineffective. One reason was there was little support for regulating businesses in the 1890s. The laws were generally pro-business and the attitude toward business and the economy was a laissez-faire one. The government generally tended to let businesses do as they pleased.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Help! please marking brainliest
ozzi

Answer:

B

Explanation:

i believe that this is the right answer and very sorry if it is wrong  

4 0
3 years ago
In what way does the structure of county and city governments DIFFER?
marshall27 [118]
D. sorry if im wrong 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is the code of hamurabi an important historical document
    8·1 answer
  • The president executes the laws in his or her role as
    15·1 answer
  • Who was Herbert Hoover Dam
    5·1 answer
  • In what different ways could a large colonial population help the economy of the mother country?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Arthashastra?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the Cumberland Road an important achievement of the American System?
    5·2 answers
  • 3. Which example illustrates the principle of checks and balances? *
    8·1 answer
  • 2 The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 overturned the National Origins Act of 1924. thereby eliminating the earlier natio
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement below correctly summarizes the cause & effect of the following?
    5·1 answer
  • How many states were in the union when edison gave this quiz in the 1920s?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!