Answer: Person-Vocation fit
Explanation: According to the question, Borris lacks Person-Vocation fit as he isn't fully satisfied in his current field of employment as a receptionist, he is aspiring for a better more Noble job profession.
Although Boris has no issue with his current company of employment, he is not satisfied with his job.
RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
Answer:
3.020
Explanation:
Morrit Corporation
interest amount = $1,080,000*.11 = $118,800
Net profit = 3% *$6,000,000= $180,000
Net profit + tax = profit before tax =
180000/.75 = 240000
Profit before tax + Interest = Earning before interest and tax
= $240,000+$118,800 = $358,800
TIE ratio= EBIT/Interest = $358,800/118,800
= 3.020
Therefore the TIE ratio is 3.020
Answer:
1. 20 units
2. $600
Explanation:
1. 
MC = 4q
Price, P = $80
For maximizing profits,
Marginal cost = Price of the commodity
4q = 80
q = 20 units


= 200 + 800
= 1,000
2. Profit = Total revenue - Total cost
= (Price × Quantity) - TC
= (80 × 20) - $1,000
= $1,600 - $1,000
= $600
3. We know that the firm in the short run will be produce at a point where total revenue is greater than the total variable cost
Average variable cost = variable cost ÷ quantity

= 2Q
MC = 4Q
Here, MC is greater than AVC at any given point.
so in the short run firm will producing short run positive profit.