4 years ago

How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?

2 answers:

3 0

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the first choice or letter A.

A secondary source would be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event because it would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.

I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!

34kurt4 years ago

3 0

CORRECT ANSWER~ (A) It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.

You might be interested in

How did the Jews practice their religion during the exile to Babylon

Alinara [238K]

Answer:

Through synagogues.

Explanation:

Your welcome.

Remember to press that THANKS button!

5 0

3 years ago

What problem did the United States and Russia still have to solve after the

aniked [119]

I think B preventing nuclear war

3 0

4 years ago

An Enlightenment idea that influenced the Declaration of Independence was that a social contract controls the way businesses mak

Rudik [331]

It is "states the rights of rulers and citizens."

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In bullet points

Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

Tribal governments are on equal footing with state government and have a government-to-government relationship with federal government. The sovereignty of each entity necessitates a government-to-government relationship at the state and tribal levels as well.

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Lincoln believe the victory for the union in the war will result in what ?

Andrews [41]

Answer:

nuclear warfare

Explanation:

because

6 0

3 years ago