The correct answer is the second choice.
A isn't correct because it should be 'dress and act,' and not 'dresses and acts.' C is incorrect because you don't have to use 'would dress and act,' because it is the wrong use of that tense. D is also incorrect because it should be 'dress and act,' instead of 'dressed and acted,' because there is no reason why you should use past tense here. B is the only correct answer given that since the first verb 'studied' is in the past tense, due to the sequence of tenses, verbs 'dressed and acted' also have to be in the past tense.
Answer:
Marilyn works for an advertising agency. She’s writing a mass email to consumers to generate interest in a new furniture product. Which three statements
a painting of a poor family
B i saw it from another site
The supporting reason for the claim that companies should give their workers time off to take classes which would appeal to customers is that "Dealing with workers who know what they're talking about is more satisfying for clients." (option D)
<h3>What is a supporting reason?</h3>
A supporting reason is a statement that supports a claim by providing a fact or a result that shows the claim is correct or reasonable. All of the options provided in the question are good supporting reasons, but we are looking for the one that appeals to customers.
Customers care about their experience when they buy the product. Therefore, to appeal to them, we need to show them that time off for workers will result in a better experience for customers.
With the information above in mind, we can select option D as the correct answer. Customers will be more satisfied, their experience will be better, if workers know what they are talking about.
Learn more about supporting reasons here:
brainly.com/question/26671494
