Denitrifying bacteria convert nitrate into <u>nitrogen gas</u>, thus returning nitrogen to the <u>atmosphere</u>.
Denitrifying bacteria- Numerous phyla are included in the broad class of bacteria known as denitrifying bacteria. This group of bacteria, which is a part of the nitrogen cycle, may carry out denitrification together with denitrifying fungi and archaea.
Phylum (Phyla)- In biology, a phylum is a rank or level of taxonomic categorization that comes after a kingdom but before a class. Although the nomenclature for algae, fungus, and plants is recognized by the International Code of Nomenclature as being equivalent, division rather than phylum has traditionally been used in botany.
To know more about the Denitrifying bacteria, click on the below link,
brainly.com/question/24197659
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct match for the terms with their description is given below:
Explanation:
- Gene: f) A sequence of nucleotides in DNA that codes for a functional product such as a protein.
- Nucleotide: d) The building blocks of nucleic acids, includes a phosphate, sugar and organic base.
- Chromosome: e) The structure that carries the DNA sequences
- Frameshift mutation a) The loss or addition of a nucleotide pair in a DNA strand.
- Point mutation: c) The substitution of one nucleotide pair for another in DNA strand.
- Genotype: g) The entire genetic makeup of an organism
- Phenotype: b) The physical and biochemical expression of the genotype.
Gravitational is only attracted and electromagnetic is both atrractive and repulsive since it depends what you are talking about
Answer:
What would be the expected result of the experiment?
For the drawing of the map part, the scientific will find that effectively, a very large number of volcanoes are located near the meeting points of tectonic plates. The volcanoes that aren't now at the edge of the plate were most probably at the moment of their formation, and were moved away by the movement of the plate.
But I doubt the scientist would be able to identify many new volcanoes, because the creation of a volcano isn't something happening overnight.
How would you interpret the results if the scientist observes no new volcanic activity?
I would say that does NOT invalidate the theory because the observation period is extremely short. 10 years is an insignificant amount of time geologically speaking... the study would have to be conducted over at least 1,000 years to maybe have some results at all. Just imagine how many volcanoes there would be if a new one was created every 10 years along the side of a tectonic plate.
