“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Wait...what king? the british? Th irish? can you be a bit specific? and his approach to what?
Answer:
Disease models of dependence
Explanation:
Substance-related disorders as a disorder which involves drugs that directly activate the brain reward system, that is feeling of pleasure. It can also be explained as the mental changes which are produced through the use of substances like drugs.
It should be understood that ,this disorder usually occurs through the abuse of banned substances, like drugs, e.g cocaine and alcohol.
Substance-related disorder can also be referred to as substance-induced disorder.
Disease models of dependence can be described as being addicted to substances of biological and environmental sources of origin.
In this case, substance-related disorder is caused through of being addicted to substances like drugs.
Either the love of forgiveness or to love enough to lay down his life.
American couples who live together before marriage are to have shown higher rates of the following:
· Divorce rate (When married of course later on)
· Having children before marriage
· Increased sexually activity between both sex
· Also shown that the relationship between the couple may grow stronger (Which this counter-balances the first answer on this list which was about the Divorce Rate)
