Answer:
Option B = a conflict between an individual role and group goals.
Explanation:
In the question above we can see that one out of the group members( Bert) make fun of almost everything and at first the other members in the group look at Bert as a someone that is so funny but later they are do not love his CONSTANT jokes and unseriousness anymore.
The reason the other group members became unhappy with Bert is because Bert is not abiding with the group goals. Bert role in the group was never to be unserious but that is what he is doing so there will surely be a Conflict between Bert roles in the group and the group goals. Work is work, there is no harm in little fun though, but work is always work that is the reason they brought the group together in the first place.
Answer:
conceptualization
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this process best illustrates the concept known as conceptualization. This term refers to when an individual performs the action or process of creating a concept or idea of something for themselves. Which is exactly what Professor Tyler has done by reading the definition of authoritarianism in order to create his own thoughts and use those thoughts to then form his own stance or idea on the subject.
Answer:
yes his consumption could change
Explanation:
His consumption of pizza could change since he might need to consume less pizza to afford more tacos. We could use the marginal rate of substitution to explain this where we describe how much goods one is willing to give up for the other while retaining maximum utility/satisfaction. So Jonny may be asked here what combination of tacos and pizza would give him same satisfaction while keeping good budget and retaining satisfaction.
