Answer: I will vote in favor of the bill.
Explanation:
Based on the above scenario, I would vote in favor of the bill. The argument here is in the case of bankruptcy, if an individual is willing to pay their dues but because of unavoidable financial circumstances, the individual seeks more time or other assistance which can help so that the person will later pay. I believe it's a good idea which should be supported by the law.
The court should have the right to decide terms of mortgages to help debtors in order for them to pay their debts in future rather than forcing them to leave the house. It will also help the country deal with issue of facilitating housing to maximum number of individuals.
In my opinion, the judge's decision should be given prime importance as the judge must evaluate the intention of the debtor and the capability of the debtor to pay the debts
Answer:
Normative
Positive
Normative
Positive
Explanation:
Positive Economics is objective and statements are usually based on facts and economic theory. They can be tested.
For example, the statement , In some circumstances, if taxes are lowered,
government revenues actually increase, can be tested and it has it basis in economic theory
Normative economics is based value judgements, opinions and perspectives. For example, the statement - taxes are too high - is based on opinion. To some it is too high while to others it would be too low
For volume and lift in a blow dry style, a round brush can be used.
Answer:
The answer is: The selling price is $76.05
Explanation:
To calculate the markup we can use the following formula:
Markup Percentage = Gross Profit / Unit Cost
where:
- unit cost = $45
- markup percentage = 69%
- gross profit = selling price - unit cost
69% = gross profit / $45
69% x $45 = gross profit
$31.05 = gross profit
$31.05 = selling price - $45
selling price = $76.05
