Answer:
Explanation:
See the attached for a spreadsheet of the values given in the problem statement. We have simply added the salary to the value of the preference and subtracted the one-time moving expense.
The right-most column shows the net increase in value of moving to Miami for each of the householders. Bonnie achieves so much more value that her net value outweighs the rather significant hit in value that Donna experiences.
If the vote is by net value to the householders, they must vote to move. There are no householders that have a net zero change in value.
_____
<em>Comment on democracy</em>
A decision based on net value does not account for the rather significant cost to Donna. If the household values mental health and interpersonal relationships, the fact that one member suffers badly from the move should be enough to sway the decision against it.
Answer:
Não Sei muito Bem mas sei que ganho muito dinheiro com meu site: https://fazerdinheiroonline.net.br/ganhar-dinheiro-na-internet/
Explanation:
Aprenda Como ganhar Dinheiro na Internet aqui mesmo
The answer is B, your employer:)
Answer:
a.$6,705
Explanation:
The total cost is the sum of the three cost component, Direct materials, direct labours, and factory overhead.
Direct Labor Cost: 71 hours x $15 per hour = $ 1,065
Manufacturing Overhead: 175 machine hours x $14 per hour = $ 2,450
Direct Materials $ 3,190
Total cost: 1,065 + 2,450 + 3,190 = 6,705
Answer:
B) diminishing marginal utility
Explanation:
The law of Diminishing marginal utility states that utility falls as consumption increases.
The law of demand states that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded.
Because of diminishing marginal utility, consumption can be encouraged by reducing price.
As utility falls, consumers would be unwilling to buy more goods at the same price, therefore it would be reasonable to reduce price to encourage consumption.
