This is False. States prefer Block Grants.
Newspapers were careful not to offend royal officials because these officials wielded a lot of power. These were officials who were either royal themselves or worked closely/directly with members of the royal family. They then had a lot of power and influence and could greatly affect the business of the newspapers. For example, a nasty article about a royal official could lead to the shutting down of the newspaper or its printing press. They could arbitrarily wield their power, money, and influence to knock down those who disgrace or humiliate them. This is especially true if any of the newspapers print any false or inaccurate materials.
<span>Apparently, the supporters of the
exclusionary rule argue that the rule is the one effective deterrent against
police misconduct because according to them, the rule must be preserved in
order to guarantee that the constitutional rights are must be honored.
Moreover, in contrast to those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished
argue that the treat of civil lawsuits should be enough to deter police
misconduct because they believed that the rule costs are too much and it
operates to precent juries from considering highly relevant evident in which it
sometimes operated to allow the guilty to go free. </span>
The following is missing for the question to be complete:
a) "You are so brave to not take your pain medication when the dressing change will hurt."
b) "If you need pain relief, I can give you some medication when I have completed the dressing change."
c) "Please explain why you say you do not hurt when I see you grimacing during the dressing change."
d) "You are so right to not take your pain medication. You can become dependent on the medication."
Answer: Please explain why you say you do not hurt when I see you grimacing during the dressing change
Explanation: From the above it is clear that the teenager feels pain during the dressing change, as it can be seen from the grimacing, the withdrawal during the dressing change as it obviously that burns hurt. Although the teenager claims that he is not in pain and does not need painkillers, that is not true, and his sister's statement is in place. It is better to take a painkiller because it is not good to suffer pain, it is not so important whether it is brave if it causes harm and if it is generally not good. One cannot become addicted to medication if it only lasts until the burn heals.
