Step-by-step explanation:
Selling price = Rs.80
Cost price = Rs.100
here, CP > SP
Now...
Loss ( L ) = CP - SP
= RS.100 - 80
= Rs.20
Now...


= 20 %
Answer:
Your answer is 3/25
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
A car starts with a dull tank of gas
1/7 of the gas has been used around the city.
With the rest of the gas in the car, the car can travel to and from Ottawa three times.
Question asked:
What fractions of a tank of gas does each complete trip to Ottawa use?
Solution:
Fuel used around the city = 
Remaining fuel after driving around the city = 1 -
= 
According to question:
As from the rest of the gas in the car that is
, the car can complete 3 trip to Ottawa which means,
By unitary method:
The car can complete 3 trip by using =
tank of gas.
The car can complete 1 trip by using = 
=
= 
=
tank of gas
Thus,
tank of gas used for each complete trip to Ottawa.