Answer:
possessive Determinants
Explanation:
Given - The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are the:
Solution -
The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are possessive Determinants.
The determinants possessive tonics always go behind the name to which they refer and agree in gender and number with the noun to the that accompany it . Example : A friend of mine is coming today.
Answer:
Invoking original jurisdiction is the only nonappeal way in which cases can reach the Court.
Explanation:
.....
In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation refers to the practice of legally attempting to influence the decisions, actions, or policies of public servants, most frequently politicians or regulators.
communicating with team members and clients the communications and replies of the government and other stakeholders. studying and researching proposed laws and regulations. attending meetings and activities, such as hearings before Congress. educating corporate officers and government authorities. They need to find a way to influence lawmakers to cast their votes in favor of the interests they represent. This entails creating customized appeals for both particular voters and voting blocs, such as Southerners or pro-choice voters. On occasion, lobbyists will also lobby one another. In its original sense, lobbying related to efforts to influence legislators' votes, typically in the lobby outside the legislative chamber.
Lobbying is any endeavor by people or private interest organizations to influence government decisions. There will always be lobbying of some kind.
Learn more about lobbying here: brainly.com/question/29614996
#SPJ4
Answer:
As a licensed electrician of 10 years Hal should be aware of the risks associated with his job. Now, I'll tell you of all of the mistakes and unnecessary risks that made by Hal. First, seeing a there was no mention of a plumber, I'm going to assume that the utility room is still flooded. If it is not still flooded then ignore this and move on to my next point, but if it is then I would just like to say that as a man with 10 years of experience, he should be aware of the fact that water conducts electricity. Second, even if the electrocution didn't involve the water, as a professional he should be competent enough to wear proper safety equipment. And finally, if I was GBC I would hire another electrician to point out every mistake made and how the entire thing could have been avoided if Hal hadn't decided to cut corners.
I hope that helps! :)
