Theories that link ongoing poverty to the personal failings of the individual, family, or community are referred to as what?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Anettt [7]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is: culture of poverty

According to the culture of poverty, parents who are trapped in poverty are more likely to teach the same behavior or way of thinking that make them poor to their children.

The lack of understanding will make the children grow up into adults who do not have the understanding on how to achieve success and eventually would be trapped in poverty cycle and repeat the same process to their children.

You might be interested in

What are monuments ? pleases help who will answer first I will make him/her brainless sorry sorry brainlist

SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

Monuments are statues, buildings, or other structures erected to commemorate a notable person or event.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

1.2 Explain FOUR contributory factors of violence locally

DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

Factors including poverty, neglect, low self-esteem, alcohol and drug abuse.

Violence can cause physical injury as well as psychological harm.

You can also go to jail for violence.

7 0

3 years ago

⦁ PLEASE HELP ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLEASE ASAP Most people live in the Humid Continental climate. It is closest to the bord

irina1246 [14]

false i think i am doing it rgiht now lol i can help you

5 0

3 years ago

Which of these is an economic indicator used to tell how an economy is doing?

Doss [256]

An economic indicator is a type of statistic data about the economic activity of a country, it enables analysis about the current situation and performance of the economy. Moreover, it also allows predictions of future performance. One economic indicator used to tell how an economy is doing is the CPI, Consumer Price Index, it takes a sample of many goods and services over two hundred unit category. The information is gathered through phone calls and personal visits.

7 0

3 years ago

At some point, it will occur to you that there is this oddity in the argument: most people living in a civil society never actua

Dominik [7]

There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.

If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.

On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.

3 0

4 years ago