1. Art enabled new understandings in this field= mathematical
2. Credited with being the founder of Renaissance painting in the Netherlands = Jan van Eyck ( he was the founder of early painting from the Netherlands who was active in Bruges)
3. His most famous painting depicts sin and redemption = Hieronymus Bosch ( Dutch painter who represented the early Netherlandish painting school).
4. He brought Germany into the mainstream of Renaissance art = Albrecht Dürer (he was a print maker and best known for his leadership due to woodcut prints).
5. Objects appear to get smaller when this increases = distance
6. Orthogonal line is not this on canvas but are in the world= parallel (the prospect lines leading to the vanishing tip are called as the Orthogonal lines)
7. The single point in a picture where all parallel lines that run from the viewer to the horizon line appear to converge = vanishing
8. The Ghent Altarpiece is this= Polyptych ( a painting which is split into panels or divisions is known as the Polyptych).
Chuck didn't quit up when Duke passed away because Duke's efforts were what had allowed Chuck to rise up again. He couldn't allow Duke's labor of love be for nothing. Chuck persisted in his efforts, and after a few weeks—as though in particular honor of Duke—he was named Assistant National Sales Manager. To honor Duke's memory, he was obligated to continue. No, Chuck carried on with his work and daily activities while Duke was by his side. He had come to understand the dog's profound love, commitment, and patience in helping him regain his footing, and he could not allow all of that work to be in vain.
Learn more about Duke passed visit: brainly.com/question/14663810
#SPJ4
Assuming you're referring to the "French and Indian War", the outcome was significant since it led to the British heavily taxing the colonists in order to pay for the war (which they won), which led to the American Revolution.
Even though im not writing the 2 paragraphs let me give you info about one of the cases: <span>Gibbons vs. Ogden: Federally issued permit vs. State (NY) issued permit to navigate waterways around New York. Marshall court re-emphasized Article VI (Supremacy) stating that federal law trumps state and this decision further emphasized the Commerce Clause stating that commerce was not defined solely as the buying and selling of goods, but the transportation thereof as well. Establishing that only the national Congress had the ability to regulate interstate trade, further strengthening the federal government over the states. This case as many affect the nature of federalism regarding its power, rights and roles. </span>
