In the given statement above, in this case, the answer would be TRUE. It is true that the inequality x + 2y ≥ 3 is satisfied by point (1, 1). In order to prove this, we just have to plug in the values. 1 + 2(1) <span> ≥ 3
So the result is 1 + 2 </span> ≥ 3. 3 <span> ≥ 3, which makes it true, because it states that it is "more than or equal to", therefore, our answer is true. Hope this answer helps.</span>
9514 1404 393
Answer:
2√30 ∠-120°
Step-by-step explanation:
The modulus is ...
√((-√30)² +(-3√10)²) = √(30 +90) = √120 = 2√30
The argument is ...
arctan(-3√10/-√30) = arctan(√3) = -120° . . . . a 3rd-quadrant angle
The polar form of the number can be written as ...
(2√30)∠-120°
_____
<em>Additional comments</em>
Any of a number of other formats can be used, including ...
(2√30)cis(-120°)
(2√30; -120°)
(2√30; -2π/3)
2√30·e^(i4π/3)
Of course, the angle -120° (-2π/3 radians) is the same as 240° (4π/3 radians).
__
At least one app I use differentiates between (x, y) and (r; θ) by the use of a semicolon to separate the modulus and argument of polar form coordinates. I find that useful, as a pair of numbers (10.95, 4.19) by itself does not convey the fact that it represents polar coordinates. As you may have guessed, my personal preference is for the notation 10.95∠4.19. (The lack of a ° symbol indicates the angle is in radians.)
A acute angle is always less than 90 degrees. So the answer is A.
Is a measurement of the value of a section of the stock<span>market. It is computed from the prices of selected stocks (typically a weighted average). It is a tool used by investors and financial managers to describe the market, and to compare the return on specific investments. HOPE THIS HELPS</span>
Answer:
The third one
Step-by-step explanation:
