<span>the mix of output that will maximize society's satisfaction</span>
Answer:
a. Amber Corporation donated inventory of clothing (basis of $138,500, fair market value of $173,125) to a qualified charitable organization that operates homeless shelters.
- charitable donations are valued at fair market value, in this case that equals $173,125
b. Brass Corporation donated stock held as an investment to Western College (a qualified organization). Brass acquired the stock three years ago for $70,800, and the fair market value on the date of the contribution is $113,280. Western College plans on selling the stock.
- Again, we must use the fair market value to record donations, in this case = $113,280.
c. Ruby Corporation donates a sculpture held as an investment and worth $200,800 to a local museum (a qualified organization), which exhibits the sculpture. Ruby acquired the sculpture four years ago for $80,320.
- use fair market once more, = $200,800
Explanation:
When you donate assets to qualifying charities, it is always better to do it by donating the itself, not selling it before and then giving the money. If you sell the asset, you will owe capital gains taxes (either long or short term). By donating the asset directly, you avoid capital gains taxes.
Answer:
It would be unethical and a conflict of interest for Solomon to let his uncle in on the details because it would give his uncle an unfair advantage against the other bidding contractors. It's a form of nepotism
Explanation:
hope this helps have a great day
Answer:
Analysis of the Big Bart line discontinuity
Opportunity Costs :
Sales ($201,000)
Savings :
Variable Costs $175,000
Fixed Costs ($30,700 - $19,800) $10,900
Financial Advantage / (Disadvantage) ($15,100)
Conclusion :
Do not eliminate / discontinue Big Bart line.
Explanation:
The results show that closing Big Bart line results in a contribution towards fixed cost being lost to the amount of $15,100. Therefore leaving the entire company in a worse off position.
