The needs of the few out weight the needs of the many but this can be
problematic because the "many" don't have necessary intelligence over
diplomatic strategies, economics, politics, military etc and the
majority can cause problems to a society in case they become "greedy" or
dependent on the system. In fact, it is more likely that democracy is
an idea in the sense that people think it's real when in reality there
are a board of leaders in place making the decisions. It is also know
that they aren't meant to last.
you should get both sides, that's what it means to be educated so why does your school ask you to get only one side...it
doesn't necessarily ensure the well-being in society, it isn't "all
good" or even existent in most cases only believed to be in place.
The Peloponnesian <span>War is the answer</span>
Answer:
Agriculture (and associated population increase) resulted in population seventies and crowding. Accumulation of waste and increased transmission of microbes owing to crowding provided the conditions conducive to the spread and maintenance of infectious disease.
Explanation:
Byzantines did play a role in the first crusade as they allowed the crusaders to pass through their territory, but provided no support.
The First Crusade (1096–1099) was the first in a line of crusades, or religious warfare, that the Latin Church of the Middle Ages started, encouraged, and occasionally oversaw. The Holy Land's liberation from Islamic dominion was the goal. Jerusalem had been governed by Muslims for hundreds of years, but by the 11th century, the Seljuk invasion of the area threatened the Byzantine Empire as well as the local Christian communities and Western pilgrimages. The Byzantine emperor Alexios I Komnenos requested military assistance from the Council of Piacenza in 1095 so that his kingdom might fight the Seljuk-led Turks. This was the first crusade initiative.
Learn more about Byzantine Empire here:
brainly.com/question/18205624
#SPJ1
