1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
2 years ago
11

Why is the Battle of Capes important

History
1 answer:
mafiozo [28]2 years ago
7 0
Battle of the Chesapeake, also known as the Battle of the Virginia Capesor simply the Battle of the Capes, was a crucial naval battle in the American Revolutionary War that took place near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay on 5 September 1781. The combatants were a British fleet led by Rear Admiral Sir Thomas Graves and a French fleet led by Rear Admiral Francois Joseph Paul, the Comte de Grasse. The battle was strategically decisive,[1] in that it prevented the Royal Navy from reinforcing or evacuating the besieged forces of Lieutenant General Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown, Virginia. The French were able to achieve control of the sea lanes against the British and provided the Franco-American army with siege artillery and French reinforcements. These proved decisive in the Siege of Yorktown, effectively securing independence for the Thirteen Colonies.

Battle of the ChesapeakePart of the American War of Independence
The French line (left) and British line (right) do battleDate5 September 1781Locationoff the Virginia Capes, Atlantic OceanResultDecisive French victory[1]Belligerents France Great BritainCommanders and leaders Comte de Grasse Thomas GravesStrength24 ships of the line with 1,542 guns[2]19 ships of the line with 1,410 guns[3]Casualties and losses220 killed or wounded
2 ships damaged[4]90 killed
246 wounded
5 ships damaged
1 ship scuttled[4][5]

Admiral de Grasse had the option to attack British forces in either New York or Virginia; he opted for Virginia, arriving at the Chesapeake at the end of August. Admiral Graves learned that de Grasse had sailed from the West Indies for North America and that French Admiral de Barras had also sailed from Newport, Rhode Island. He concluded that they were going to join forces at the Chesapeake. He sailed south from Sandy Hook, New Jersey, outside New York harbour, with 19 ships of the line and arrived at the mouth of the Chesapeake early on 5 September to see de Grasse's fleet already at anchor in the bay. De Grasse hastily prepared most of his fleet for battle—24 ships of the line—and sailed out to meet him. The two-hour engagement took place after hours of maneuvering. The lines of the two fleets did not completely meet; only the forward and center sections fully engaged. The battle was consequently fairly evenly matched, although the British suffered more casualties and ship damage, and it broke off when the sun set. The British tactics have been a subject of debate ever since.

The two fleets sailed within view of each other for several days, but de Grasse preferred to lure the British away from the bay where de Barras was expected to arrive carrying vital siege equipment. He broke away from the British on 13 September and returned to the Chesapeake, where de Barras had since arrived. Graves returned to New York to organize a larger relief effort; this did not sail until 19 October, two days after Cornwallis surrendered.

You might be interested in
Was the US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family? Why?
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.

Explanation:

The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.

They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.

8 0
2 years ago
PLS HELP ME I WILL MARK U AS BRAINLIEST
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

the 1st answer.

Explanation:

In all of the 1900s, political figures went conservative and sought to go against such communist claims. In supreme court, it was ruled that the safety of the United States was a higher concern than accused communists because they represented danger.

7 0
3 years ago
What does The Primary Chronicle say about Rurik and the origin of Novgorod?
DIA [1.3K]
<span>
 it says that the slaves invited the viking chief rurik to be there king . so in 862 he founded novforod , russias first important city 

</span>
6 0
3 years ago
1)Which of these was an example of a Union state that did not allow slavery?
-BARSIC- [3]
The correct answer for 1 is C. Ohio

Ohio never had slavery because it was created according to the Northwest Ordinance as a state that is slave free. The other three had slaves and Texas even had them during the war since they didn't participate in it and they found a loophole in the Emancipation proclamation to keep having slaves.

The correct answer for 2 is a. Kentucky

Kentucky never seceded and joined the Confederacy but they wanted to and were even given confederate congress seats. However, the war ended and they remained a part of the Union just like they were before and during the war.

The correct answer for 3 is
<span>b.slave states in the Union

These were states like Kentucky which were found at the border with the confederacy. They had slaves but had not seceded and did not join the Confederacy. When West Virginia broke from Virginia it became a border state too.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which component of the Compromise of 1850 most enraged Northerners?
klio [65]

Correct answer choice is :


C) The Fugitive Slave Act


Explanation:


The south got by the strengthening of the fugitive slave law, the north got a new free state, California. Texas lost empire but was paid with 10 million dollars to pay for its debt. Slave trade was banned in Washington DC, but slavery was not. One of the parliamentary bills that were passed as part of the Compromise of 1850 was a new variant of the Fugitive Slave Act. At first, Clay proposed a treasury bill including these measures. Calhoun criticized the plan and asked that the North cease its efforts to restrict slavery.


3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A local park is always littered with trash. Every time Alisha takes her dog to the park, she can’t help but notice that trash is
    7·1 answer
  • How did the development of the steam engine lead to major social changes during the indistral revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • The Triple Entente consisted of
    10·2 answers
  • Number the following events in the correct order....
    6·1 answer
  • Which was not a reason for European explorers to sail west? A) to locate the "land bridge" B) to search for gold C) to find the
    11·1 answer
  • 50+ Points!!!!
    10·2 answers
  • All witch hunts have some things in common, regardless of whom they target. which of the following statements best describes som
    12·2 answers
  • What was the effect of President Roosevelt's attempt to balance the federal budget?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the Ottoman Empire rise to power in the first place
    5·2 answers
  • History need HELP please
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!